Tomi Lahren recently made some statements on abortion that riled up conservatives. That isn’t surprising as I’ve called her a RINO in the past and when I hear people speak about her. She is a dim-witted blonde struggling to keep up with the politics of today clinging on to the political controversy to stay relevant. She is also an abortionist because she believes women have the right to an abortion. So, are people against Roe vs. Wade because they are religious zealots? Should conservatives dodge using the court as their religious laws?

She, like a lot of conservatives, are always two steps behind their democratic opponents. Do the Democrats care that much about misusing the Supreme Court to achieve their goals? This is why Democrats achieve their ends by jamming their policy through. They don’t care about “Rule of Law”. Secondly, nobody is arguing to create a state church but that doesn’t mean we aren’t allowed to let our religious views affect our political judgments. Third, why suppose that the Constitution is obligatory but my religious viewpoint isn’t?

http://spirited-tech.com/COG/2017/08/25/why-were-losing-liberty/

Dear Pro-Aborts, Please Stop Pushing Your Religion On Us

The challenge to fake conservatives is to show where the Constitution speaks to the issue of Abortion. Most recognize that search is vain and requires reading feminist delusions back onto the Constitution. But I thought Lahren was all about the Constitution? The point is that we cannot reduce personhood to that of the whim of the state. Do states have the right to declare African Americans aren’t human now? So, this is an issue of the Federal Government. I cannot see how the outlooks can both survive without serious conflict. If the conservatives are right, then the liberals are murderers of children on the level of genocide. If the liberals are right, then conservatives are forcing arbitrary false convictions on the others.