This is a collection of arguments against Sola Scriptura from Catholics. They really will be the same old arguments used by them but a collection of the refutations to them.
The place to start is with the issue of the definition of Sola Scriptura:
On the Meaning of Sola Scriptura
Does sola Scriptura mean sole authority?
What does sola scriptura mean?
1. Scripture is meant to be read in a community:
Reading Scripture in community
2. The papacy is needed for proper interpretation of the Bible and to reject it leads to “chaos”(30,000 Denominations):
If sola scriptura is the problem, is the magisterium the solution?
Imperspicuous objections to perspicuity
Is background information necessary?
The “real” reason why sola Scriptura is untenable
“Scripture interprets Scripture” through the centuries
The a priori argument against sola Scriptura
The a priori argument against sola Scriptura
Does the Magisterium actually solve the problem it poses for itself?
3. Prooftext for Apostolic Succession and the Papacy:
Prooftexting apostolic succession
4. Private Interpretation:
5. The Church gave us the Canon:
The Issue of Canon and Sola Scriptura
How To Argue For Sola Scriptura
The question of sola Scriptura
6. Sola Scriptura isn’t in the Bible(therefore it is self-refuting):
Is sola scriptura in scripture?
Is sola Scriptura self-refuting?
Sola Scriptura and textual criticism
7. Sola Scriptura is ad hoc:
8. This contains most of the criticisms in two articles:
Ten objections to sola scriptura-1
The Council 