It seems fairly obvious that lies are being produced to convict innocent people (Kyle Rittenhouse) and let guilty people off (Julius Jones). This is a weaponization of the Justice department by mob rule and that will eventually be the end of civility in the west. I wish to show the lies in the case of Julius Jones:

Critiquing this article from the “Innocence” Project:

https://innocenceproject.org/julius-jones-death-row-oklahoma-what-to-know/

The citations for where I got my information comes from this website run by Paul Howell’s family:

https://www.justiceforpaulhowell.com/

1. Julius Jones was at home having dinner with his parents and sister at the time of the murder; however, his legal team failed to present his alibi at his original trial. His trial attorneys did not call Mr. Jones or his family members to the stand.

Jones initially denied this and said his parents were mistaken. This is covered extensively by the “Justice for Paul Howell” website:

This issue was raised on appeal and the case was sent back for an evidentiary hearing. At the hearing, Jones’ parents testified Joneswashomethe night of the murder, along with a family friend. The family friend testified that she was in fact not with the Jones’ that evening, but they were confused as it was the day before. Both of Jones’ former attorneys testified that Jones had told them that he was not at home the night of the murder and that his parents were mistaken. Jones was present at the hearing and had every opportunity to refute his family friend and his attorney’s testimony. He chose not to. A total of five witnesses testified that Jones was not at home at the time of the murder.
NOTE: Jones was represented by new counsel at the evidentiary hearing.

Even the testimony from the family has several inconsistent elements (such as when they became aware of when Paul Howell was murdered).

2. Mr. Jones did not match the description of the person who committed the crime, which was provided by a sole eyewitness. The person who killed Mr. Howell was described as having 1-2 inches of hair, but Mr. Jones had a shaved head.

3. A man named Christopher Jordan matched the eyewitness’ hair description, but claimed only to have been the “getaway driver” and not the shooter at trial. He was the State’s star witness against Mr. Jones.

In exchange for testifying that Mr. Jones was the shooter, Mr. Jordan was given a plea deal for his alleged role as the “getaway driver.” He served 15 years in prison and, today, he is free.

There were three-eye witnesses. She (Paul’s sister) was the only adult that saw Julius murder her brother in cold blood. This is the most common lie about the case. He also had short hair and not a shaved head. They lie about her testimony because it is of no help to Julius:

The witness testified that she could see “about half an inch to an inch” of the man’s hair between his stocking cap and “where his ear connected to his head.” When specifically asked, the witness testified that she did not see braids or corn rows.

In other terms, she saw his sideburns. This matches Julius Jones better than Christopher Jordan. She was not commenting on the length of hair, but rather the area of hair.

4. Three people incarcerated with Mr. Jordan at different times have said in sworn affidavits that Mr. Jordan told each of them that he committed the murder and framed Mr. Jones. None of these three men have met Mr. Jones and they do not know one another. And none of them have been offered a shorter sentence or incentive in exchange for disclosing Mr. Jordan’s confessions.

I wonder the names of the three individuals that Jordan allegedly confessed his supposed crimes (while he deserved a much more severe punishment) I think these people are lying:

Emmanuel Littlejohn and Christopher Berry are both convicted murderers. Littlejohn, a death row inmate, was determined to be a “pathological liar” and not credible by the defense team. Berry, ultimately convicted of child abuse murder, posed his own credibility problems. Berry’s testimony actually implicated Jones, as he claimed that Jordan had told him“his partner in the case was charged with capital murder”.

I don’t know who the third individual that they are referring to. Furthermore, his statement that he is guilty of the murder isn’t sufficient to establish that he is. It may be the case, that he would do such to bolster himself as a mastermind criminal (for gang affiliation). It would be nothing more than an embellished legend than anything of facts. We also are relying on the testimony of bias wicked liars. For example, the child abuse murderer killed a baby by pouring boiling water on their genitals. The campaign to free Julius has sent him money for him to tell these lies. So, he has a financial motive to state these things. In fact, I hope these liars are executed just as soon as Julius because they are all lying murderers of the worst kind.

1. Mr. Howell, a white man, was killed in a predominantly white neighborhood. Immediately, then District Attorney Bob Macy characterized the crime as an act of violence committed by Black men, fueled by drugs. This narrative was perpetuated by media coverage.

This crime was committed by a black man and Bob Macy isn’t relevant. He wasn’t even the DA when Julius was actually on trial. He was the DA when he committed the crime.

2. The officer who arrested Mr. Jones called him the n-word and dared him to run, then implied he would shoot him if he did.

3. Eleven out of the 12 jurors at Mr. Jones’ trial were white, and one juror referred to Mr. Jones by the n-word, and suggested that he be taken out behind the courthouse and shot.

These are just irrelevant and unimportant details that don’t change the facts of the case. Furthermore, the claims about the officer are probably a lie:

Jones never made the allegation of an arresting officer using a racial epithet until the airing of The Last Defense.

Jones’ only alleged example of racializaiton was the prosecutions use of the word “prowl.” The truth is the word “prowl’ is very apt for what Jones did when he drove around until he found his prey.

During the trial, a juror notified the judge of a comment overheard by another juror, but it was never reported as hearing the use of a racial slur. The reporting juror went on to admit that the evidence was so overwhelming that she “still believes to this day, that Mr. Jones is guilty of shooting and killing the victim.” 

Furthermore, does the use of the N-word mean that the evidence is lacking? I don’t think it does and I don’t think that using a racial epithet entails the entire case needs to be dismissed because of racism. These are incoherent leftist SJW standards that don’t deal with reality.

4. One-third of District Attorney Macy’s death penalty convictions have been overturned due to prosecutorial misconduct. Many of those whose convictions were vacated are Black people. To date, 10 people sentenced to death in murder cases in Oklahoma have been exonerated.

This doesn’t give us the details of those cases, the names, or anything other than a bad inference that this is like those cases. The other issue has already been stated the Macy isn’t relevant to Julius Jones:

Bob Macy did not prosecute Jones. In fact, Macy was not even in office at the time of the trial. Wes Lane was the District Attorney in office at the time of the trial.

For More:

http://spirited-tech.com/2021/09/27/julius-jones-celebrities-favorite-murderer/