I wish to share here just some of the responses I have made to Julius Jones supporters.

KuroRiya:

All of your evidence aside, I don’t understand why everyone is so against a new trial for this man. I understand it is going to be difficult for the Howell family, but you know what’s also difficult? Being executed for a crime you didn’t commit. (1/2)

His trial was a sham, and no amount of evidence can negate that. If he gets convicted again, then fine. But if there is even a .001% chance someone is innocent, they should not be executed. He deserves to go to trial again.

This appears to be a bit irrational to state this “His trial was a sham, and no amount of evidence can negate that.” If no amount of evidence will convince this person, then why care about another trial? The evidence is the reason why he shouldn’t get another trial. It overwhelmingly shows that he murdered Paul Howell. How can his trial be a sham if there is sufficient evidence of his guilt prior to and post his conviction?

“But if there is even a .001% chance someone is innocent”

This is just to say that nobody should go to prison because there is always some probability that shows someone might be innocent. Ted Bundy had a .001% chance and I’m glad they went with the evidence.

——————————————————————————————————-

tamlynn76:

Ah the DNA that was procured from the corrupt District Attorney Bob Macy, who btw was accused of conspiring to commit forensic misconduct and fraud on multiple cases involving death row.
Several of his death penalty convictions were overturned because of his misconduct!

This is a common error already addressed:

This crime was committed by a black man and Bob Macy isn’t relevant. He wasn’t even the DA when Julius was actually on trial. He was the DA when he committed the crime. …

This doesn’t give us the details of those cases, the names, or anything other than a bad inference that this is like those cases. The other issue has already been stated the Macy isn’t relevant to Julius Jones:

Bob Macy did not prosecute Jones. In fact, Macy was not even in office at the time of the trial. Wes Lane was the District Attorney in office at the time of the trial.

http://spirited-tech.com/2021/11/12/the-innocence-project-on-julius-jones/

Furthermore, this is no more than only conspiratorial conjectures to think that Bob Macy found the gun, wipes Jones’s face with the bandana, snuck it into his crawl space, convinced 8 unrelated witnesses to lie, and to possess the same white T-shirt with black trim that the shooter had. All for a case that he would not even be dealing with because he retired. Is Bob Macy a Nolan film?
This also requires that Bob Macy would be knowledgeable of the future because they convicted him without the DNA evidence. The DNA evidence was found not by the persecutors of Julius, but the movement trying to free him. It also was found with practices not available in 1999, aka why Bob Macy would have to predict over a decade later the technological advancements.

Mind you, the test was conducted by those trying to free Julius Jones. It came back that he was most likely (by overwhelming odds) the main contributor to the DNA on the murderer’s clothing.

Make up your mind. Also relevant is the fact that no witnesses were called to the stand bc of his unqualified defense team, & Chris Jordan confessed to being the shooter.

Firstly, who is the defense going to call as a witness? Paul Howell? They didn’t have any witnesses for a reason.

Secondly, his defense was highly capable and dealt with murder cases before. His lawyer was very experienced for his age and admitted that he didn’t do well cross-examining Christopher Jordan.

Thirdly, Chris Jordan didn’t confess to being the shooter. I’ve addressed the problem with trusting baby murderers that receive money for lying about Chris Jordan:

I wonder the names of the three individuals that Jordan allegedly confessed his supposed crimes (while he deserved a much more severe punishment) I think these people are lying:

Emmanuel Littlejohn and Christopher Berry are both convicted murderers. Littlejohn, a death row inmate, was determined to be a “pathological liar” and not credible by the defense team. Berry, ultimately convicted of child abuse murder, posed his own credibility problems. Berry’s testimony actually implicated Jones, as he claimed that Jordan had told him“his partner in the case was charged with capital murder”.

I don’t know who the third individual that they are referring to. Furthermore, his statement that he is guilty of the murder isn’t sufficient to establish that he is. It may be the case, that he would do such to bolster himself as a mastermind criminal (for gang affiliation). It would be nothing more than an embellished legend than anything of facts. We also are relying on the testimony of bias wicked liars. For example, the child abuse murderer killed a baby by pouring boiling water on their genitals. The campaign to free Julius has sent him money for him to tell these lies. So, he has a financial motive to state these things. In fact, I hope these liars are executed just as soon as Julius because they are all lying murderers of the worst kind.

http://spirited-tech.com/2021/11/12/the-innocence-project-on-julius-jones/

Here is another response:

Fun Fact: I was a 911 dispatcher in Edmond at the time this occurred back in 1999. I can assure you the shooting happened at night and the windows on PH’s Surburban SUV were heavily tinted. So the sister’s & daughter’s eye witness account is questionable!

Firstly, it seems that Julius Jones and Chris Jordan would be at the disadvantage. Tinted windows are harder to look through than see out of. Hence the motivation for tinted windows.

Secondly, after the shooting of her brother saved two children because she is a hero. She was probably able to watch him for several seconds as she recused the children. She was able to identify the bandana and his shirt (both match Julius Jones’s clothing).

Thirdly, if she couldn’t reliably see anything then why does the defense trust her on her testimony to implicate Chris Jordan? Seems like you put the defense in a harder position to answer questions.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————–

sheannabana:

Why do you hate America? The constitution ensures the right to a fair trial. There’s a whole ass amendment in the BoR. it’s the sixth, there are ten (to save you the time). If he’s guilty, find him guilty with a fair trial. Can’t do that. Let him go. This isn’t hard.

This case has been thoroughly investigated:

A total of 13 appellate judges and the standards of appellate review Supreme Court have all reviewed Julius’s conviction and sentence.