This is for anyone wanting resources on Michael martin and Transcendental argument for the Non-Existence of God (TANG). For more on a case for TAG regarding induction:
A start for a philosophy of Christian science: Part 7 – The Council (spirited-tech.com)
Jimmy Stephens:
(1) Michael Martin’s TANG – YouTube
Dr. Greg Bahnsen:
M. Martin Under the Microscope
2 – Influences, Inaccuracies (2 of 14)
3 -Terms, Burden of Proof (3 of 14)
5 – Biases, Non-rationality (5 of 14)
6 – Misses Transcendental Challenge (6 of 14)
7 – Transcendental Failure, Part 1 (7 of 14)
8 – Transcendental Failure, Part 2 (8 of 14)
9 – Transcendental Failure, Part 3 (9 of 14)
10 – Faith and Reason, Part 1 (10 of 14)
11 – Faith and Reason, Part 2 (11 of 14)
12 – Evidences, Part 1 (12 of 14)
13 – Evidences, Part 2 (13 of 14)
14 – The Attempted Refutations of Theism (14 of 14)
Dr. John Frame:
.
Michael Martin is a professor of philosophy at Boston University. His books include Atheism: A Philosophical Justification (Temple University Press, 1990) and The Case Against Christianity (Temple University Press, 1991). His most recent attack on the Christian faith comes in his article The Transcendental Argument for the Non Existence of God (Autumn 1996, The New Zealand Rationalist).
Below are responses to the works of Michael Martin.
- (Exchange #1)
- The Transcendental Argument for the Non Existence of God (1996) (Offsite)
By: Michael Martin
This is Martin’s article in which attempts to reverse the claims of the transcendental argument given by Reformed apologists. The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God demonstrates God’s existence by showing that knowledge itself would be impossible if the Christian God did not exist. Martin sees this claim as reversible and provides herein an article to that effect. - A Brief Response to Michael Martin’s Transcendental Argument for the Non-Existence of God
By: John M. Frame
- The Transcendental Argument for the Non Existence of God (1996) (Offsite)
- (Exchange #2)
- A Response to John Frame’s Rebuttal of The Transcendental Argument for the Non Existence of God (TANG) (Offsite)
By: Michael Martin - A Second Response to Martin
By: John M. Frame
- A Response to John Frame’s Rebuttal of The Transcendental Argument for the Non Existence of God (TANG) (Offsite)
- (Exchange #3)
- Response to Frame’s Response (Offsite)
By: Michael Martin - A Third Response to Martin
By: John M. Frame
- Response to Frame’s Response (Offsite)
- (Exchange #4)
- A Third Response to Frame
By: Michael Martin - Frame’s Final Response
By: John M. Frame
- A Third Response to Frame
- (Final Remarks)
- Martin Closes (Offsite)
By: Michael Martin
By mutual agreement, Martin has been given the closing word.
- Martin Closes (Offsite)
Dr. Michael Butler:
- TAG vs. TANG
By: Michael Butler - Butler’s Defense of TAG and Critique of TANG (Offsite)
By: Michael Martin
,
The Council 