Notice that Dr. Bowen can only dismiss the question as a Presuppositionalist tactic. That even though he apostatized from the faith that he never questioned his blind faith in his moral precepts. Dr. Bowen isn’t a philosopher, and most people aren’t ANE scholars, yet he still requires those to deal with his arguments regarding slavery. Now, I’m not bothered by biblical slavery:
https://spirited-tech.com/2017/06/05/the-bible-and-slavery/
I don’t endorse a lot from Robert Rowe given our differences, but he did take this fair account:
I would also mention the difference in argumentation from Dr. Bowen is discussing with a fellow scholar that holds a different position:
Where does he think the Bible teaches murder and rape? Of course, it isn’t unlikely that Dr. Bowen is participating in more fanciful scholarly exegesis, as he has tendencies for:
The Council 