Author: TheSire
John 6: Carson and White
The CoG+: Discussing Flowers Article on John 6:44
B.C. Askins vs Dan Courtney
This is an old debate exchange between B. C. Askins (presuppositional apologist) and Dan Courtney (atheist). Here are the parts: B. C.: Part 1 Dan: Part 2 B. C.: Part 3 Dan: Part 4 B. C.: Part 5 Dan: Part 6 Continue reading B.C. Askins vs Dan Courtney
Shamounian Mistakes
In an exchange with Sam Shamoun in his comment section. Sam tries to debunk Calvinism and he fails to do so. I informed him that he missed the point in his video attacking Calvinism. I explain that the reformed perspective on Colossians 1:20 is directed towards an eschatological interpretation and that he is inconsistent in his interpretation. I argued he ended up creating difficulty between the members of the Trinity. That reformed Christians maintain that faith is the means by which we are united with Christ and is not irrelevant. He deleted my original statements and I will try to … Continue reading Shamounian Mistakes
Two Books
I have for a long time held a hatred for the metaphor of the “two books” that those who consider themselves scientifically enlightened use as some sort of theological point. It usually is a ploy to undermine the inerrancy and authority of scripture. I have talked about it here. I wish to share Steve Hays’ thoughts on the issue: “God gave humanity two primary sources of revelation about himself: the world that he created and the Scripture that he inspired. These are also known as the Book of Nature and the Book of Scripture…God is a God of truth. As the author of … Continue reading Two Books
A start for a philosophy of Christian science: Part 1
This is the beginning of a series of articles related to the issue of Christianity and Science. These are a short defense of the idea that Christianity is necessary for science. Here are the other parts: Part 1, Part 2, Part … Continue reading A start for a philosophy of Christian science: Part 1
A start to a philosophy of Christian science: Bibliography
Bibliography: http://www.intelligentdesign.org/whatisid.php ·http://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?SpeakerOnly=true&currSection=sermonsspeaker&keyword=Michael%5EButler He’s at Butler-Harris.org ·Dr.Greg Bahnsen’s “Myth of Neutrality” and “Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and defended”. His lectures and materials can be found at http://www.Cmfnow.com –http://www.cmfnow.com/articles/pa146.htm ·Dr. J.P.Moreland and Dr.William Lane Craig – Philosophical Foundations for a Christian worldview ·Dr.Stephen Meyers -“Darwin’s Doubt ” -“Signature in the cell DNA evidence for intelligent design” · Dr.Donald Batten- http://creation.mobi/haldanes-dilemma-has-not-been-solved ·http://carm.org/secular-movements/evolution/problem-genetic-improbability · Dr. Jonathan Sarfati – ” The greatest hoax on earth” ·http://creation.mobi/geneticist-evolution-impossible ·Ronald W. Di Giacomo (Reformed Apologist)- http://reformedapologist.blogspot.com/2006/05/induction-and-knowledge.html?m=0 http://reformedapologist.blogspot.com/2006/05/more-on-induction-and-knowledge.html?m=0 · Dr.Vern Poythress -Redeeming science -Redeeming philosophy · Dr.John Frame -The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God -The Doctrine of God … Continue reading A start to a philosophy of Christian science: Bibliography
A start for a philosophy of Christian science: Part 7
This is part seven in my series on science.Here are the other parts: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, and Bibliography. The problem of induction: Let’s say that we observe a large number of objects with characteristic A, noting that all of them also possess characteristic B. It is natural for us to conclude that, in all probability, all objects with A also possess B — including those objects with A that have yet to be observed (or cannot be observed). The question Hume asked is, “What … Continue reading A start for a philosophy of Christian science: Part 7
A start for a philosophy of Christian science: Part 6
This is part six of my series on science. Here are the other parts: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, and Bibliography. The Biblical Perspective on Science What is the biblical view of providence? Is it natural law? Is it indeterministic? We must have a biblical view of God’s providence, in order to dictate what Christian science would be. What’s the biblical evidence? The Bible pictures him acting with the creation directly and indirectly. We should speak of God acting in time, like when he creates light … Continue reading A start for a philosophy of Christian science: Part 6

You must be logged in to post a comment.