A Response to Soteriology 101 by Chris Harris

A Response to Soteriology 101 by Chris Harris The original article/blog post can be found here: Calvinism’s Conflation – SOTERIOLOGY 101 It wasn’t that long ago that I was asked the question “how is it that one can be saved?” My reply was, of course, to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ. Throughout all of the Monergism vs Synergism (or however you wish to label it) debate over the centuries this answer, although universal, has had many different understandings. Some would suggest that man’s belief is due to a wholly monergistic work of God (Monergism), while others would suggest this … Continue reading A Response to Soteriology 101 by Chris Harris

The Lahren Challenge

Tomi Lahren recently made some statements on abortion that riled up conservatives. That isn’t surprising as I’ve called her a RINO in the past and when I hear people speak about her. She is a dim-witted blonde struggling to keep up with the politics of today clinging on to the political controversy to stay relevant. She is also an abortionist because she believes women have the right to an abortion. So, are people against Roe vs. Wade because they are religious zealots? Should conservatives dodge using the court as their religious laws? She, like a lot of conservatives, are always … Continue reading The Lahren Challenge

Parsing Revelational Epistemology

Presuppositionalists tend to state that they hold to something called “Revelational Epistemology”. But what does that mean? What does that entail? In order to answer those questions, we will have to enter into modern philosophical debates to answer them. Epistemology is the study of knowledge. It deals with what constitutes(or what is the content) of our knowledge, the justification of our knowledge, and the structure of our knowledge. The Content of Knowledge: This is to ask for what makes up our knowledge? Do we know things because of our senses? Because of our reason? How do we acquire knowledge? The … Continue reading Parsing Revelational Epistemology

Presuppositionalism and Historical-Grammatical Hermeneutics

Recently, I was on the atheist brain-cell killing zone of “Friends of The Bible & Beer Consortium”. The group attracts all the village atheist to leave their intelligence behind and set up shop in a Facebook group. The exchange I had was between Randall Theo(a troll) and Ty Wilson. Neither of them has a view of their own and can’t answer basic questions of their own worldview. But in the middle of their profound ignorance they asked a question that pops up from time to time: TheSire said: Randall, how do you account for laws of logic, objective moral norms, … Continue reading Presuppositionalism and Historical-Grammatical Hermeneutics

Moral Anti-realist and Politics

I find that most atheists are antirealist when it comes to morals. They yet spend their lives wasting away to discuss the issue of political systems. They tend to be angry communist-socialist with many strange arguments for it. The issue is they are anti-realist about ethics and think that their political beliefs are better than another. But given the rejection of objective moral norms and obligation no system is “better” than another and nothing obligates you to push their idea. All their arguments are reducible to preference without any fact of the matter. They live an absurd life, In rejecting … Continue reading Moral Anti-realist and Politics