Author: TheSire

Ethics, HomosexualityLeave a comment

Guide for responding to a Pervert Apologist

TheSire

The issue of what the Bible says about sexual ethics has been challenged and in modern times have been twisted to teach false doctrines and other things. This will just be a resource article on various sexual issues that crop up from time to time. Pervert Apologist come in many forms fake Christians, Atheist, etc. 1. Homosexuality: The issues of how the Bible looks at these kinds of relationships are being misinterpreted by “Gay Christian” proponents like Matthew Vines, James Brownson, and others. The questions here are twofold in Christian circles: Is homosexuality condemned and how should we live knowing … Continue reading Guide for responding to a Pervert Apologist

apologetics, Atheism, Jimmy Stephens, logic, Metaphysics, PresuppositionalismLeave a comment

Tautologicality and Christian Conceptualism

TheSire

I’ll respond to this because I think it is a good example of how people don’t understand the issue of when presuppositionalist discuss logic. This is some atheist named Barry on the internet responding to Hays’ about logic on the article “From Whence Does Logic Come? (And why you can’t use it to prove God)”. Steve Hays replied to the “first principles” part and said: “But necessary truths of logic can’t derive from contingent truths of the physical world. In many respects, the physical world might have been different. Causation is a weaker principle than logical entailment.” Well first, Hays is … Continue reading Tautologicality and Christian Conceptualism

Ancient Near East, Homosexuality, Sentinel ApologeticsLeave a comment

Guardians of the Gay

TheSire

Some have bought the lines thrown out by those who argue the Bible is compatible with homosexuality. Robert Rowe was throwing some of those liberal arguments out there in an article he wrote. https://www.sentinelapologetics.org/single-post/2018/04/09/Homosexuality-Why-Christians-Should-Not-Use-Leviticus-1822 Certain schools of theology will have you learn artificial systematic ways in which we can organize these laws, placing them into ceremonial, civil, etc. Unfortunately no one in the ANE (including Moses) would even understand our artificial musings. Rowe’s mistakes are that it will take an actual argument to demonstrate these claims. The claim that distinctions in the Law are artificial would just be the claim … Continue reading Guardians of the Gay