I was asked to comment on this article: http://www.christcovenantcolorado.com/if-justification-is-immutable/ What these theologians fail to realize is that by using this argument, they undermine the doctrine of sola fide. Scripture is clear that the entrance into justification is by faith alone and … Continue reading If Justification is Immutable…
I recently had an exchange with Leighton Flowers over the issue of a serious mistake Leighton has made for years. This is conflating the inability to believe with the inability to understand. That often leaves Leighton’s arguments confused and misguided. … Continue reading The Natural Man: Calvinism and the Ability to Understand
Click here to watch on youtube. Continue reading The Third Man – Episode 4: A Critique of Eric Hernandez & Libertarian Free Will
[responsivevoice_button] I wish to collect the ideas of John Cranman and the critiques of him that I find most successful. We have had some extensive dialogue with him and his friend and I think we can codify some of these … Continue reading Divine Intentions and Human History
A good discussion between Eli and Bignon. Continue reading Bignon Discussion
@I never said they stated their beliefs this way, but that it is one of their difficult options to take in the light of penal substitutionary atonement. Neither is there any argument or evidence as to why this would have to be the case in our view. No, wild and speculative theories are not evidence. Citation is still lacking. @The obligation is on him(assuming he takes this route) to answer why it doesn’t follow. I seem to recall the burden of proof being with the accuser. I don’t have disprove an assertion that doesn’t have any real weight behind it. … Continue reading ArminianDeceptions.Com
I recently discussed the issue of 1 Cor. 10:13 again with John Cranman: John Cranman TheSire, the first paragraph is not what I’m arguing. All I’m saying is that this verse affirms PAP/CCFW, and is thus incompatible with compatibilist determinism. I am not arguing for moral responsibility. I am only arguing that it supports the idea that believing agents had two or more options they could’ve chosen – which falsifies compatibilist determinism. TheSire: The article argues the freedom Paul writes is that of believers. But usually, your side maintains all mankind has LFW. So, unbelievers would lack LFW. John Cranman: … Continue reading ‘Provide the way of escape’
This continues our series of Thibodaux failing to comprehend why he is wrong. So, I’ll waste my time in another response: Our objector crashes and burns again. @I’ve stated that either this means the pardon is effectual unless one believes, which then means limited atonement is the case in a strange form. “Pardon is effectual unless one believes?” So we’re pardoned unless we believe, therefore if we believe, we’re not pardoned? I’m not sure this guy even knows what he’s saying…. This is a grammatical mistake in the prior article that was fixed. @”Or Christ atones for everyone in the … Continue reading Flying High , Crashing Hard
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.