Agnosticism is often presented as a position of humility—a refusal to commit to belief or unbelief in God due to insufficient evidence. But beneath this modest exterior lies a bold philosophical claim: that human reason can function autonomously, without dependence … Continue reading Agnosticism and the Illusion of Autonomy
Given our current sensory experience, how can we justify inferences from them and from our records of the past, to the future and to the sorts of scientific laws and theories we seek?(Rosenberg 2013) Hume’s argument:A conclusion is justified either … Continue reading The Present Problem: Induction, Materialism, and the Illusion of Justification
Cactus: I understand that the problem of induction is philosophically pressing. To base your worldview on whatever answers this one complicated question best seems fair to me. But it does not follow that it’s True. I believe you will always … Continue reading The Inductive Challenge: Why Rationality Needs Christian Theism
Scientist discuss how infinitely more complex life is than evolutionists of old knew. Continue reading Life is far more complex than atheists think.
By Jimmy Stephens Introduction In the ongoing debate between evolution and creationism, one often overlooked but critical issue is the epistemological foundation upon which evolutionary theory stands. This foundation is known as uniformitarianism—the assumption that the processes observed today are … Continue reading The Epistemological Crisis of Uniformitarianism and the Incoherence of Natural Selection: A Reformed Critique
by Jimmy Stephens w/ Vincent In this video, Emerson Green tries to define subjective morality. He has this to say: “Subjective indicates some kind of dependence on a mind or minds or a person or persons. The simplest form of … Continue reading Why Objective Morality Requires God: A Response to Emerson Green
From Chris Matthew: There are a couple of remarks that merit response, @FondestAlloy. 1. Do you deny the possibility of knowing whether something is objectively true?2. You describe pessimistic meta-induction well. In the future, there is the possibility (a high … Continue reading Epistemic Chaos: The Disarray of Unbelief
Squash: Gents and ladies, I’ve been hanging around POLITICS and am experienced with a flavor of presup over there that looks a little like this. P1: God is the necessary precondition for knowledge.P2: Knowledge.C: God. When pushed for P1, I’ve … Continue reading Theonomous Reasoning and Knowledge: A Philosophical Discussion
“Given our current sensory experience, how can we justify inferences from them and from our records of the past to the future and to the sorts of scientific laws and theories we seek?” (Rosenberg 2013) Hume’s argument: A conclusion is … Continue reading Hume’s Challenge: Justifying Induction in Modern Philosophy
Richard Spencer on Twitter: “The Aloha-shirt clad “Ortho Bros” think they’ve really got something with the “transcendental argument” for being a Christian. https://t.co/t9ZRgUu1Id” / Twitter The Aloha-shirt clad “Ortho Bros” think they’ve really got something with the “transcendental argument” for … Continue reading Ortho Bros, TAG, & Spencer
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.