Here is a dialogue with a catholic that Jimmy had over the issue of justification and Sola Scriptura: Jimmy Stephens: When we speak about justification we’ll have to get straight that we can have multiple justifications for one belief. I … Continue reading How is Sola Scriptura Justified?
Here is an apologist named Jon Klaus making the case that Van Tilians ought to accept axioms: https://twitter.com/_languagegames/status/1703516640644932082 Here is Jimmy Stephens’s response to him: I would mount a threefold objection. First, exegetical. Insofar as revelational epistemology (hereafter, RE) aims … Continue reading Do Van Tilians Need to Accept Axioms?
Click here to watch on YouTube: Continue reading Is the Roman Catholic Canon Open?
Click here: Continue reading JTB and Gettier Cases
Jimmy Stephens argument: P1. If fallibilism, fallibilism is knowable. P2. If fallibilism is knowable, there exists a reason against non-fallibilism. P3. If fallibilism, all putative reasons against non-fallibilism beg the question against non-fallibilism. P4. No cases of question begging are … Continue reading Fallibilism: An Uncertain Contention
JP Moreland and Tim Stratton: Tyler and Colton’s Review Part 1: Tyler and Colton’s Review Part 2: I couldn’t join unfortunately and neither could Jimmy. But we discussed Tim before: https://spirited-tech.com/2022/04/14/review-of-the-stratton-white-debate/ Continue reading JP Moreland Refuted on the Free Thinking Argument
Phenomenal conservatism (PC) is the epistemological view according to which, roughly, the way things seem or appear to be is a source of justification for believing that things are actually so. Jimmy Stephens explains: The problem with PC is that … Continue reading Phenomenal Conservatism
Jimmy Stephens has helpful advice when discussing Revelational Epistemology and circularity: It depends on what is meant by “circularity.” Normally, we treat logical circularity as fallacious, for one reason or another. Logical or inferential circularity is where you repeat a … Continue reading Circularity Again
Pallmann has responded to me again. He remarks that my criticisms have verged on the bizarre. Perhaps I have been unclear. To rectify this, I will recount our dialectic here and hopefully eliminate any misunderstandings. Pallmann has stated and implied … Continue reading Analyticity, Logic, and Aristotle
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.