You know that this is going to be a collection of resources on the topic of rape in the Bible. I think the Bible is against rape and condemns such. Tyler Vela: FREED BYTE: Deut 22:28-29: A Manual for Marrying … Continue reading Does the Bible condone rape?
The ever-changing unchanging church of Rome has struck again. This isn’t about adulterous Catholics and communion. It is about the recent development of the Pope’s thoughts about capital punishment. The Pope, having the spine of a jellyfish and the Biblical knowledge of Richard Dawkins, has come to the conclusion that it is “inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person”. There is yet another way to eliminate others, one aimed not at countries but at individuals. It is the death penalty. Saint John Paul II stated clearly and firmly that the death penalty is … Continue reading The Papacy and Capital Punishment
I’m making this article to store articles on how to think about moral dilemmas. Triablogue: Sophie’s Choice Do the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few? Operation Mincemeat Choosing the lesser sin Continue reading Moral Dilemmas
[responsivevoice_button] I’d like to first thank Chris Matthew for his helpful editing and sharing his thoughts on the article itself. It is often discussed whether the Law has any moral authority for Christians. The debate is amongst those that view … Continue reading The Law and the New Testament
I find that most atheists are antirealist when it comes to morals. They yet spend their lives wasting away to discuss the issue of political systems. They tend to be angry communist-socialist with many strange arguments for it. The issue is they are anti-realist about ethics and think that their political beliefs are better than another. But given the rejection of objective moral norms and obligation no system is “better” than another and nothing obligates you to push their idea. All their arguments are reducible to preference without any fact of the matter. They live an absurd life, In rejecting … Continue reading Moral Anti-realist and Politics
The Euthyphro Dilemma sets theist with a Dilemma. Is God’s will good because he wills it, or because it appeals to an outside standard of goodness? The Christian takes this to be that Goodness is grounded in God’s being or nature. The issue that arises from that is that people push the issue to another problem: What does it mean to say God is good? Does that mean God is God? Does goodness lose all meaning? The way Christians get around this issue is that when we say “God is good” we are saying not that “God is God” but … Continue reading Is God good?
The issue of what the Bible says about sexual ethics has been challenged and in modern times have been twisted to teach false doctrines and other things. This will just be a resource article on various sexual issues that crop up from time to time. Pervert Apologist come in many forms fake Christians, Atheist, etc. 1. Homosexuality: The issues of how the Bible looks at these kinds of relationships are being misinterpreted by “Gay Christian” proponents like Matthew Vines, James Brownson, and others. The questions here are twofold in Christian circles: Is homosexuality condemned and how should we live knowing … Continue reading Guide for responding to a Pervert Apologist
Many atheists and annihilationist believe that nobody deserves Hell. That infinite punishment is never merited by any amount of finite sin. God must punish people in proportion to the crime. That seems intuitive but intuitions are person and culture relative. I think it is intuitive that God punishes plenty of people eternally for their crimes on earth. Man’s deeds deserve the repercussions that God places on them. Many(actually all) cases in Human history testify to the deservedness of eternal damnation. How confident are you in the intuition that finite sins cannot merit eternal damnation? Would a history lesson make you … Continue reading Infinite Punishment for Finite Sins?
This is an article that is an introduction to what I believe the method of Reformed Apologetics that we should use and that should be understood as the best approach. 1. Transcendental Argument: This is just an introduction to the presuppositionalist argument known as TAG. TAG stands for the transcendental argument for God’s existence. What is a transcendental argument(TA)? They are arguments that deal with preconditions of knowledge and I think it could be expanded to one that deals with the preconditions for ethics. These are truths that are necessary for other truths to make sense. It means that a certain belief is … Continue reading A little Presup before Dinner
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.