Category: Presuppositionalism
Crampton my style
I find some of the most hypocritical and terrible objection of Van Til came from Clarkians. They would provide analysis of Van Til and Frame and ignore the fact that the infallible Clark made similar mistakes. Whether it be Gary Crampton or John Robbins. Here is Crampton’s article and Hays’ response: http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=191 http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2005/07/why-im-not-cramptonian.html Continue reading Crampton my style
Van Til’s Concrete Universal
Semiotic Analysis of the Observer in Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and a Possible Theory of Everything
You ever wonder what a Christian philosopher and theologian have to say on Quantum Mechanics? Look no further than Dr. Vern Poythress that has tackled almost any topic imaginable. Semiotic Analysis of the Observer in Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and a Possible Theory of Everything Antimatter Redeeming Physics: Biblical and Theological Resources for a God-Centered Approach Continue reading Semiotic Analysis of the Observer in Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and a Possible Theory of Everything
The Case for the Resurrection
Clarkianism
Here are a list of my favorite articles on Clarkianism: http://misclane.blogspot.com/2013/10/critiques-of-clarkianism-and.html?m=1 http://reformedapologist.blogspot.com/2013/02/scripturalism-skepticism-and-knowledge.html?m=0 http://rcdozier.blogspot.com/2017/04/criticisms-of-clark.html?m=1 http://rcdozier.blogspot.com/2014/01/clark-and-van-till.html http://rcdozier.blogspot.com/2014/01/clarks-thought_26.html Continue reading Clarkianism
Frame, Bahnsen, and Anderson.
Here are some reformed apologetics audios: Dr. Cornelius Van Til: Philosophy and Apologetics Modern Theology Christianity in Conflict Christ and Man Dr. John Frame: History of philosophy and Christian thought https://presupp101.wordpress.com/donations/john-frame-mp3s/ Christian apologetics Frame on Ethical decision making Lecture on knowledge Lecture on Apologetics What is presuppositional apologetics? Frame on Ethics Dr. Greg Bahnsen: https://presupp101.wordpress.com/donations/greg-bahnsen-mp3s/ Bahnsen vs Sproul Myth of Neutrality Reasoning with Unbelievers Stein vs Bahnsen Final sermon Smith vs Bahnsen Worldviews in conflict Evolution and Islam Dr. James Anderson: James Anderson MP3’s Dr. James Anderson and the History of philosophy and Christian thought Dr. James Anderson and Christian … Continue reading Frame, Bahnsen, and Anderson.
Divine conceptualism is Univocism?
Some very great men that I admire think that Divine conceptualism employs univocal reasoning. Dr. James Anderson and Dr. Greg Welty have responses to such a charge. Mainly in responses to Nate Shannon. “Nevertheless, one might worry that identifying propositions with divine thoughts breaches the Creator-creation distinction. Do we really want to say that God himself is the propositional content of all our human thoughts? Doesn’t that in some sense bring God “down to our level”? If that’s the concern, I think there’s a relatively straightforward solution to it. We can say that one part of the creation is a … Continue reading Divine conceptualism is Univocism?
Original sin is unjust?
Steve Hays in his “I’m glad you asked” blog series deals with common objections to the Christian faith. Here’s his response to those who attack original sin. http://triablogue.blogspot.com.br/2004/04/im-glad-you-asked-7.html?m=1 “Original Sin I suppose most folks have an intuitive resistance to original sin. It seems unfair. Yet what, exactly, is it that prompts this instinctive reaction? There is a difference between being blamed for doing some I didn’t do, and being blamed for something I didn’t do. The former is unjust because it is untrue. But the latter is subtler. When men rankle under the dogma of original sin, I doubt that … Continue reading Original sin is unjust?
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.