In Defence of the Finest of Presuppositionalists: A Response to Omni by Chris Matthew Hello there. I’m writing in response to Omni’s video about classical logic and presuppositionalism. I’m a modest (Framean) presuppositionalist. Now, I am not committed to classical … Continue reading In Defence of the Finest of Presuppositionalists: A Response to Omni
“The Folly of Unbelief: Philosophical Illustrations of the Futility of Unbelieving Thought” is the best introductory text for Van Tilians since William Dennison’s work “In Defense of the Eschaton: Essays in Reformed Apologetics” and Dr. Christopger Watkin’s “Thinking through Creation: … Continue reading The Folly of Unbelief
Here is an interview with two prominent Van Tilians, Daniel Akande and Jimmy Stephens: His book can be found here: https://pushingtheantithesis.blogspot.com/p/my-books.html This also leads directly to his blog: http://pushingtheantithesis.blogspot.com/ This article was also discussed in the video: http://pushingtheantithesis.blogspot.com/2021/08/islam-neoplatonism-and-concept-of.html Continue reading The Folly of Unbelief – An Interview with Daniel Akande
Ronald Di Giacomo appeared on Eli’s show and they had a great Q&A. I appreciate Ron’s work and recommend anyone check out his blogs: https://philosophical-theology.com/ Continue reading Apologetics Q & A w/ Ron Di Giacomo
We have just joined Rumble. So, Check out our content: Jimmy’s search for the Answer of Induction Jimmy’s search for the Answer of Induction Continue reading Jimmy’s search for the Answer of Induction
Daniel Akande has written a book called “The Folly of Unbelief: Philosophical Illustrations of the Futility of Unbelieving Thought”. Daniel is a prolific blogger and a highly informed Van Tilian thinker. This will surely be an upcoming classic text for … Continue reading Book Promotion: The Folly of Unbelief
This is another response to David Pallmann: To briefly review our controversy, in my video against presuppositional apologetics I argued that Aristotle’s transcendental argument (TA) for the law of noncontradiction was fatally flawed for three distinct reasons two of which … Continue reading What has Aristotle to do with Van Til?
Pallmann has responded to me again. He remarks that my criticisms have verged on the bizarre. Perhaps I have been unclear. To rectify this, I will recount our dialectic here and hopefully eliminate any misunderstandings. Pallmann has stated and implied … Continue reading Analyticity, Logic, and Aristotle
I think platonism suffers from further issues than the video states. Take the issue from different angles: The problem of Induction, Causality, and reliability of our minds: It is hard to see that there is much a reason to suppose … Continue reading Plato: A Van Tilian’s Thoughts
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.