Debate Review Part 2: Addressing Misconceptions about Sola Scriptura and Biblical Interpretation

This is part two of the review, and it should be straightforward to address. For the first part: https://watchmencouncil.com/2024/01/04/the-battle-of-doctrinal-foundations-examining-sola-scriptura-and-tradition/ Here is the second point of his opening statement: A commonly asked question by my opponent (and Protestants like him) who … Continue reading Debate Review Part 2: Addressing Misconceptions about Sola Scriptura and Biblical Interpretation

Unpacking Epistemological Assumptions: A Review of Mclatchie’s Framework

I’d like to offer some thoughts on Jonathan Mclatchie’s review of “Canon Revisited – Establishing the Origins and Authority of the New Testament Books, by Michael J. Kruger.” I’ve touched on his perspective briefly before, and I believe this is … Continue reading Unpacking Epistemological Assumptions: A Review of Mclatchie’s Framework

Challenging Catholicism: Unveiling Inconsistencies

The challenge lies in the fact that Catholicism has produced some of history’s greatest intellects, leveraging their insights to craft robust defenses against the critiques I’ll raise. Over centuries, they’ve refined their arguments and apologetics. Complicating matters, Catholicism encompasses diverse … Continue reading Challenging Catholicism: Unveiling Inconsistencies

The Battle of Doctrinal Foundations: Examining Sola Scriptura and Tradition

I’ll be conducting a series where I review segments of this debate. https://www.debateart.com/debates/5110-the-bible-is-the-sole-rule-for-all-christian-doctrinal-and-moral-principles In this debate, I am here to disprove the Protestant notion of sola scriptura: that is, according to the Baptist Confession of 1689: “The Holy Scripture is … Continue reading The Battle of Doctrinal Foundations: Examining Sola Scriptura and Tradition