apologetics, Articles, justification, Roman Catholicism, Rome, theologyLeave a comment

Justification is by Faith Alone: Issues and Evidence

TheSire

Keith Thompson: Justification is by Faith Alone: Issues and Evidence Baptismal Regeneration & Justification are False “Works” and “Works of the Law” in Paul The Council: Paul and James on justification Dr. James White on Justification Dr. Thomas Schreiner: The Five Solas – Sola Fide Continue reading Justification is by Faith Alone: Issues and Evidence

Deity of Christ, Dr. James Anderson, Reformed Apologist (Ronald W. Di Giacomo), Steve Hays, Substance Dualism, theology, Trinity, UnitariansLeave a comment

Did God Die?

TheSire

http://reformedapologist.blogspot.com/2012/04/did-person-die-on-cross-or-just-jesus.html http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2017/04/the-immortal-dies.html?m=1 http://triablogue.blogspot.com/2017/04/when-god-mighty-maker-died.html?m=1 http://www.proginosko.com/2017/05/tuggys-triad-and-the-death-of-god/ Continue reading Did God Die?

politicsLeave a comment

Liberal Inconsistencies

TheSire

In this debate, you will notice that Cenk Uygur wishes to fix the corrupt government. That both parties are horribly influenced by outside principles and reduced to sophistry. That money in politics has made politicians useless and continued with his script. On the other hand, he thinks this isn’t true for his liberal politicians’ friends. They are utterly corrupt as well via their relationship with unions and their corporations. They are not as bad. The thing we need to do is send more money to these corrupt politicians through our taxes and they will surely do that which is best. … Continue reading Liberal Inconsistencies

apologetics, Atheism, Calvinism, Epistemology, Jimmy Stephens, justification, logic, Metaphysics, philosophy, Presuppositionalism, science, Sola Scriptura, theology, Trinity, WarrantLeave a comment

Hawkeye

TheSire

I recently got into an exchange with a classical apologist, Spencer Hawkins. So, the credit goes to him. Here’s how it went: “1) Your first move is to shift the burden of proof. You make the claim that ALL non-Christian worldviews are logically impossible,” i)The issue is that to propose a question-begging claim. To say that it is possible doesn’t show it to be possible. From the Christian perspective, my God is the measure of what is and is not possible. You even say later “I can imagine the Christian God not existing without running into a logical contradiction”. This … Continue reading Hawkeye