Calvinism, theologyLeave a comment

Timeless foreknowledge?

TheSire

Dr. Paul Helm wrote this in his work ‘Eternal God: A study of God without Time, Second edition’. Pages 98-100 What is it that the timeless foreknowledge is before? It cannot be before anything for the timeless knower, for him there is no temporal before or after, since he occupies no position in time. Thus for a timeless foreknower the statement: (a) I foreknow that A Where A is some event or action in a temporal ‘stream’, is necessarily false, since for it to be true A would have to stand in some temporal relation to the foreknower, which is … Continue reading Timeless foreknowledge?

apologetics, Jimmy Stephens, PresuppositionalismLeave a comment

Pluralism?

TheSire

Jimmy Stephens has taken a stab at the pluralist objection to TAG. “1.) All worldviews which hold to two contradictory propositions are irrational. 2.) Pluralism holds that an infinite set of worldviews are necessarily possibly true. 3.) All infinite sets of worldviews contain worldviews which contradict Pluralism. 4.) Pluralism holds to two contradictory propositions: [a] that pluralism is necessarily true and [b] that pluralism is not necessarily true. 6.) Therefore, Pluralism is irrational.” Continue reading Pluralism?

Calvinism, Polemics, theologyLeave a comment

Faith alone implies Christ alone

TheSire

It’s been said that I reject Grace alone and faith alone by Christian Anarchist and his friends. This is another false charge of “Spiritually Dishonest Ministries”. Anarchist has had a problem with me and now wishes to move from attacking my character to that of attacking my doctrine. Just not on an issue of mere simple doctrine , but on the heart of the Gospel. In leveling these charges he attacks my place before God. Which is something I take seriously. While he supports sodomy he condemns me as unorthodox. I think he needs to read up. The questions now … Continue reading Faith alone implies Christ alone

Calvinism, Doctrine of God, hermeneutics, theologyLeave a comment

Does God love everyone?

TheSire

Introduction:  Most people think that God loves every individual human that has ever existed. For such a universal dogma, you would expect it to be explicitly said all over the bible, but there’s no explicit statement that actually says that. So, they rely on deduction to derive this doctrine. We will see if they are successful in proving such. That isn’t to say that it is invalid to use good and necessary consequence, but I don’t think that they adequately apply such. We should also keep in mind the doctrine of impassibility. I’ve already shared resources on that before and … Continue reading Does God love everyone?