Recently I had a question asking whether “covenant theology” is so-called “replacement theology.” Those dispensational critics of Reformed covenant theology who accuse it of… First, the very category of “replacement” is foreign to Reformed theology because it assumes a dispensational, Israeleo-centric way of thinking. It assumes that the temporary, national people was, in fact, intended to be the permanent arrangement. Such a way of thinking is contrary to the promise in Gen. 3:15. The promise was that there would be a Savior. The national people was only a means to that end, not an end in itself. According to Paul in … Continue reading Covenant Theology Is Not Replacement Theology

Everyone has a creed, even those who say they don’t. Refusing to confess your theology publicly results in restriction, not freedom. Source: Ligon Duncan on Why ‘No Creed But the Bible’ Is a Lousy Creed Continue reading Ligon Duncan on Why ‘No Creed But the Bible’ Is a Lousy Creed