Here Dan Chapa points out an issue with the Dynamic Omniscience crowd: yet you do not know what tomorrow will bring. (James 4:14, see also Prov. 27:1). Are these types of verses a challenge for open theism/DO? Shouldn’t they say … Continue reading What tomorrow will bring
Just wish to share GK Beale’s thoughts about this difficult subject: Paul is using the same imagery in 4: 15-17. What has been traditionally understood as the second coming of Christ is best conceived as a revelation of his formerly … Continue reading In the Air
Here is a dialogue Jimmy had with an Eastern Orthodox: Apologia: our epistemic source is our faculties which are gifted to us by God. Even the bible talks about this in Romans 1 and how atheists are at fault because … Continue reading Sola Scriptura and Circularity
Here is a part of a dialogue with a Catholic Apologist over the issue of Justification: B. Catholic: I think it’s really important to note that in recent decades, the Catholic Church has acknowledged that the traditional Lutheran understanding of … Continue reading Sola Fide: Abrahamic Justification vs Papal Justification
Here is a dialogue with a catholic that Jimmy had over the issue of justification and Sola Scriptura: Jimmy Stephens: When we speak about justification we’ll have to get straight that we can have multiple justifications for one belief. I … Continue reading How is Sola Scriptura Justified?
Here is an apologist named Jon Klaus making the case that Van Tilians ought to accept axioms: https://twitter.com/_languagegames/status/1703516640644932082 Here is Jimmy Stephens’s response to him: I would mount a threefold objection. First, exegetical. Insofar as revelational epistemology (hereafter, RE) aims … Continue reading Do Van Tilians Need to Accept Axioms?
Dr. Rasmussen: Dear Christians, if you have been thinking that the Bible is the highest authority *on the grounds that was inspired by God*, then, to be consistent, you should also believe that if God inspires a personal dream or … Continue reading Dreams and Sola Scriptura
The problem with taking 2 Pet. 1:21 as a support for the inspiration of Scripture should be obvious for anyone who reads it slowly and deliberately: It does not refer to the inspiration of Scripture per se but rather to … Continue reading Poitier on 2 Peter 1:21
Ricky: So there’s God Who has concepts of us in His mind even before creation And then there’s creation Where those concepts are made manifest in flesh Ig? Nick: For me, I take a more radical view on the topic. … Continue reading What is the Nature of Reality?
Here we have Dan Chapa talking to Dr. Abasciano discuss a 1 Corinthians 12:3. This is to pair up with my prior article here: https://watchmencouncil.com/2023/08/01/43/ Continue reading Dr. Abasciano on 1 Cor 12:3
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.