š Series: Responding to Ferris on John 6 Analysis of Ferrisās Eucharistic Interpretation: Challenges and InconsistenciesA final critique addressing logical, doctrinal, and scriptural inconsistencies in Ferrisās view. Metaphorical Musings: Analyzing Ferrisā Approach to John 6 in āHow to Be ChristianāAn … Continue reading Misreading the Bread of Life: Ferris and the Flesh-Spirit Divide in John 6
š Series: Responding to Ferris on John 6 Analysis of Ferrisās Eucharistic Interpretation: Challenges and InconsistenciesA final critique addressing logical, doctrinal, and scriptural inconsistencies in Ferrisās view. Metaphorical Musings: Analyzing Ferrisā Approach to John 6 in āHow to Be ChristianāAn … Continue reading Why āEating Jesusā Means Believing: A Biblical Answer to Ferris
š Series: Responding to Ferris on John 6 š Part 2 ā Romans and the Doctrine of Justification 5.2 The Connection to the Last Supper Another common objection is that the language in John 6 anticipates the institution of the … Continue reading The Logic of Life: Faith, Not Flesh, in John 6
Introduction: The Exegetical Battlefield Few verses in Scripture have been as contested in theological discourse as 1 John 2:2: “He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.” … Continue reading He Is the Propitiation: Why Assurance Flows from a Finished Atonement
Leighton Flowers, through his platform Soteriology 101, presents a synergistic perspective on salvation, emphasizing human libertarian free will and interpreting the Father’s “drawing” in John 6:44ā45 as an enabling act through teaching rather than an irresistible force. 1. Drawing as … Continue reading Why the Father Never Fails: A Rebuttal to Leighton Flowers on John 6
by Jimmy Stephens Introduction In this article, internet apologist Jonathyn criticizes the doctrine of simplicity. Specifically, he is out to refute a Thomist version of the doctrine, what he calls āAbsolute Divine Simplicity.ā By using the term absolute, I take … Continue reading Absolute Divine Simplicity
1. Introduction Paulās heart aches for his kinsmen. At the start of Romans 9, he pours out sorrow that so many in IsraelāGodās own covenant peopleāhave rejected their Messiah (Rom. 9:1ā3). How could it be that those who were given unparalleled privileges … Continue reading Not All from Israel: Paulās Purposeful Silence on Proselytes in Romans 9
In this article, I offer a series of brief but critical reflections on Dr. Joel Korytkoās recent interpretation of Romans 9, particularly his rejection of the Calvinist view of divine election. Dr. Korytko argues that Paul’s use of “seed” (ĻĻĪĻĪ¼Ī±) … Continue reading The True Seed
Does Romans 9 teach unconditional electionāor is Paul merely rehearsing Israelās history? A recent debate tested the exegetical ground. Introduction In the much-anticipated debate between Dr. James White and AK Richardson on the interpretation of Romans 9, the foundational question … Continue reading Mercy, Will, and Resistance: A Review of the WhiteāRichardson Debate on Romans 9
Part 1: The Context and Logic of Romans 8:28ā30 ā Who Is Paul Talking About? Ferrisās Core Claim Ferris repeatedly insists that Romans 8:28ā30 is not making a definitive theological claim about the nature of salvation. Instead, he claims Paul … Continue reading How Not to Read Romans: A Response to Ferris (How to Be Christian)
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.