Warren McGrew’s supporters argue that Original Sin cannot be true because children cannot know they are fallen in Adam. However, this objection overlooks several key points. First, knowledge of sin is not a necessary requirement for accountability. It is possible … Continue reading Original Sin vs. Age of Accountability: A Theological Examination
“The soul that sins shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, nor shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the … Continue reading The Misuse of Ezekiel 18: Original Sin and Generational Accountability
By Jimmy Stephens Introduction In the ongoing debate between evolution and creationism, one often overlooked but critical issue is the epistemological foundation upon which evolutionary theory stands. This foundation is known as uniformitarianism—the assumption that the processes observed today are … Continue reading The Epistemological Crisis of Uniformitarianism and the Incoherence of Natural Selection: A Reformed Critique
Combined Objection to Hypothetical Universalism Thesis Hypothetical universalism fails because it makes faith meritorious and renders the atonement a meaningless potential rather than an actual, effective work. The only way for the atonement to have real value is through particular … Continue reading The Intrinsic Power of Christ’s Atonement: A Case for Particular Redemption
by Jimmy Stephens w/ Vincent In this video, Emerson Green tries to define subjective morality. He has this to say: “Subjective indicates some kind of dependence on a mind or minds or a person or persons. The simplest form of … Continue reading Why Objective Morality Requires God: A Response to Emerson Green
By Jimmy Stephens and TheSire 1. Sincerity of the Offer (Deceptive Offer Argument) Objection: If God sovereignly intends that some people never come to Christ, how can His gospel offer to them be sincere? Isn’t it deceptive to command someone … Continue reading The Sincerity of the Gospel Call: Resolving the Apparent Dilemma in Limited Atonement
Atheist’s Question: Jimmy Stephens’ Response: The question demonstrates an immense ignorance about the problem of universals. How can a man be a particular? After all, the word “man” is a universal. No matter what word I pick out to classify, … Continue reading God as Universal and Particular: Answering the Atheist’s Query with Van Til’s Theology
Classical Apologetics is an approach to Christian apologetics that emphasizes the use of rational arguments and evidence to demonstrate the truth of Christianity. It typically follows a two-step method: Classical Apologetics: Key Arguments Cosmological Argument: Teleological Argument: Moral Argument: Ontological … Continue reading Classical Apologetics: Stated and Rejected
In discussing the evolution of the doctrine of papal infallibility, it’s essential to recognize the various theories that have emerged over time. This article explores the shift from a broader understanding of papal authority as defined in Vatican I to … Continue reading The Evolution of Papal Infallibility: A Critical Examination of Modern Theories and Historical Challenges
Jewish Tradition on Yetser Tov and Yetser Ra: “Provisionists, do not take up the ‘yetser tov’ and ‘yetser ra’ as your interpretation of Genesis. Rabbi Nahman bar Shmuel bar Nahman said in the name of Rav Shmuel bar Nahman: ‘Behold … Continue reading Understanding Yetser Tov and Yetser Ra: A Caution Against Provisionist Adoption
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.