Hypothetical universalism (HU) is one of those positions that sounds like it’s giving everybody what they want. You want to say “Christ died for all” in some real sense? HU says yes. You want to keep penal substitution and not … Continue reading What Is an Atonement?
Co-written with Jimmy Stephens Introduction Tony Byrne recently offered an extensive reply to my vacuity objection against Hypothetical Universalism (HU). While I appreciate the theological depth and historical citations he brings to the conversation, his response ultimately fails to address … Continue reading Christ Died for Sins, Not Categories
Combined Objection to Hypothetical Universalism Thesis Hypothetical universalism fails because it makes faith meritorious and renders the atonement a meaningless potential rather than an actual, effective work. The only way for the atonement to have real value is through particular … Continue reading The Intrinsic Power of Christ’s Atonement: A Case for Particular Redemption
By Jimmy Stephens and TheSire 1. Sincerity of the Offer (Deceptive Offer Argument) Objection: If God sovereignly intends that some people never come to Christ, how can His gospel offer to them be sincere? Isn’t it deceptive to command someone … Continue reading The Sincerity of the Gospel Call: Resolving the Apparent Dilemma in Limited Atonement
