Author: TheSire
God with a Bod
Chris Fisher said: I’m not sure I’ve ever claimed God is a physical entity. I’ve questioned the usefulness of the category “physical” and stated God has bodies. How do you have a non-physical body? Physical things are usually contrasted against … Continue reading God with a Bod
The Fairy Tale of Humanism
Jimmy Stephens shares some ideas: One problem I have with a neutral alignment view of humanity is that it fails to explain human history. Another is that it is inconsistent with a useful conception of motivation. I can get into … Continue reading The Fairy Tale of Humanism
Left Twix and Right Twix
The man that shall not be named wrote a little response to me. I found the time and the will to torture myself through another one of his bitter sad attempts to undermine what I’ve said. Not much left from our dearest objector. All he’s got now is a parting shot on how the Arminian view of free will is kind of like Open Theism (gasp!) -as long as you discount the central difference of whether God can know our choices beforehand. Well, that’s because they both are indeterminist. There is no significant difference between them regarding the issue of … Continue reading Left Twix and Right Twix
Owen’s Argument
The answer to the trilemma is fairly trivial: While refusal to believe is indeed a sin, the reason it keeps one from salvation is not due to it being a sin, but because unbelief, by definition, precludes belief in Christ, without which no one can be saved (Heb 11:6). As with all sins Christ died for, forgiveness for unbelief is only obtained through subsequent belief in Him. While Owen’s argument is trifling at best, his sophomoric reasoning isn’t the biggest problem here. While unstated, there is a premise both insidious and heretical that one must hold to make this argument … Continue reading Owen’s Argument
The Thibodaux Saga
These will contain all my responses to the Arminian Perspectives website and possibly other responses to the website. Provided in chronological and subject order. TheCouncil: [Topic: Aseity/Transcendental Critique] Arminianism and Aseity Thibodaux’s Cooked Goose Thibodaux: The Saga Continues Libertarian Foreknowledge … Continue reading The Thibodaux Saga
The Difference
Recently, an older video surfaced of a certain Arminian trying to explain the difference between his view of LFW and an Open Theist perspective. Here is what he said: Continue reading The Difference
The Cult of Arminianism
I have been engaging in an exchange with the writer over at Arminian confusions website. Thibodaux has struggled to understand the most basic and simple points. His whining about self-imposed dependencies was a waste of time and his views are quite shallow. Here is the latest installment of his failure: @God isn’t the ultimate arbiter of what is correct on your view. When the n00b’s reasoning skills fail him, outright lies are the his weapon of choice. That was because of an argument that God couldn’t be the basis of all truth because certain facts are beyond the control of … Continue reading The Cult of Arminianism
Christian Persecution Climbing
The early Church was married to poverty, prisons, and persecutions. Today, the church is married to prosperity, personality, and popularity. Leonard Ravenhill A report shows that a century ago Christians comprised 20% of the population in the Middle East and North Africa, but since then the proportion has fallen to less than 4% or roughly 15 million people. But it seems as of late the mainstream media refuses to report such facts or at least twist the truth. Recently, May of 2019, a report commissioned by the British foreign secretary, Jeremy Hunt, explains that millions of Christians in the region … Continue reading Christian Persecution Climbing
Reading Comprehension
Thibodaux refuses to accept the fact that he is wrong. So, he has another attempt to show us why he is wrong again: Our dearest n00b objector shows amazing endurance in shoveling out more silliness. It’s just as easily dismissed. He means he ignores it because he doesn’t have any meaningful response to it. @So, you have to further explain where the fault is with my argument. Already done in showing that God is the Arbiter of what is correct (see above). Any variance from the Arbiter’s definition, by definition, would be incorrect. God isn’t the ultimate arbiter of what … Continue reading Reading Comprehension
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.