Aseity Without Modal Collapse: A Neo-Reformed Reply to Mindtrap

Mindtrap’s argument (in brief) runs like this: God’s aseity means none of God’s knowledge “comes from” creatures (or from any “logical implication” involving creatures). God’s knowledge of you is the “idea of you.” All contingent details about you (desires, actions, … Continue reading Aseity Without Modal Collapse: A Neo-Reformed Reply to Mindtrap

Is God a Deceiver? Response to Tim Stratton’s Argument

Tim Stratton has repeatedly argued that Calvinism—if consistent—renders God a “deity of deception.” The idea is simple but alarming: if God determines all beliefs, and some of those beliefs are false (including beliefs about God Himself), then God must be directly causing theological falsehood—and thus functions as a deceiver:

“If exhaustive divine determinism is true, then God causally determines all false theological beliefs—even those about Himself. That would make Him the ultimate source of deception.”

Continue reading “Is God a Deceiver? Response to Tim Stratton’s Argument”

The Father is Greater than I

I’ve been dialoguing with an LDS. Here is his latest objection: Not true. Most of these verses refer to Jesus in his glorified and resurrected state: John 14:28; 20:17; Rom. 15:6; 2 Cor. 11:31; Eph. 1:2–3, 17; 5:20; Col. 1:2–3; … Continue reading The Father is Greater than I