Author: TheSire

Jimmy Stephens, Metaphysics, Presuppositionalism1 Comment

Hive Mind

TheSire

Jimmy Stephens tackles a worldview where comprehensive knowledge is had amongst an infinite amount of minds.  TheQuestioner:  Yeah, the I mean the former of replacing an omniscient mind with the idea of a societal distribution of comprehensive knowledge. Essentially, in this case, each proposition is known. Jimmy Stephens: 1.) It would be a fallacy of division to suppose that because all propositions belong to the whole of human society that each individual inherits the comprehensive set. In fact, that sounds like a good skeptical scenario: one where humanity might, as a sort of hive mind, know things, but no human … Continue reading Hive Mind

Classical Theism, Deity of Christ, Doctrine of God, Eternal Generation, holy-spirit, Infinite Regress, Jimmy StephensLeave a comment

Eternal Frustration

TheSire

Here are some recent thoughts that I have had about the topic of eternal generation. I was dialoguing with a Latin trinitarian. He stated that the Father possesses a property that causes him to emanate the Son.  So, naturally, I asked if the Son possesses that same property then it seems like he should emanate a son aswell.  This was his thoughts about that problem: Every property of the divine essence is firstly a hypostatic property of the Father; but each property which is communicated is instantiated distinctly by the distinct hypostases. Ergo, when you say “is THIS life-givingness, etc.” … Continue reading Eternal Frustration

Arminianism, Calvinism, Doctrine of God, FreewillLeave a comment

Thibodaux: A Dependent Independence

TheSire

Thibodaux has written a response to my article. So, let’s review it: http://spirited-tech.com/COG/2019/08/06/thibodaux-the-saga-continues/ https://arminianperspectives.wordpress.com/2019/08/09/tackling-calvinist-errors-on-omniscience-aseity-plus-a-deductive-proof/ I’ve been pretty clear since the beginning of our dialogue that God doesn’t derive His attributes from creation. Quoting previous posts: Does Thibodaux not distinguish between a person professed position and the implications of the position? Sure, he denies that that is his position but that is the implication of his position. He doesn’t do anything to dispell us of that argument. To sum up the heretofore poorly-explained objection, the objector makes the error of conflating the attribute of omniscience with the specifics of God’s knowledge. … Continue reading Thibodaux: A Dependent Independence

Chris Matthew, Homosexuality, Liberalism, philosophy, politics, TransgenderismLeave a comment

‘LGBT’: Intelligible or Incoherent?

TheSire

This will be a collection of articles against transgenderism. Here are the points of privilege(he/him pronouns): Chris Matthew: ‘LGBT’: Intelligible or Incoherent? Benjamin H. Arbour: Transgenderism, Human Ontology, and the Metaphysics of Properties TheCouncil: Gender and Biology Thank You, Comrades! Continue reading ‘LGBT’: Intelligible or Incoherent?

Freewill, Jimmy StephensLeave a comment

Libertarian Foreknowledge

TheSire

Jimmy Stephens recently stated something that I have been arguing with J. C. Thibodaux. Here is a relevant part of the conversation: TheQuestioner: In a discussion with a fellow believer, I brought up the fact that Jesus declared to Peter that He would deny Him as an example against the PAP. I said that because Jesus knew in advance what Peter would do, Peter couldn’t have done otherwise. They said that this doesn’t suggest that Peter couldn’t have done otherwise, but would not do otherwise. Would you say that God’s knowledge of what we will do means that we could … Continue reading Libertarian Foreknowledge

EthicsLeave a comment

Bridled Tongues

TheSire

I was in a recent conversation about whether profanity is inherently immoral. Here are some of the statements and questions that arose: If you can’t read this in violation of Matthew 15:10-20, Ephesians 4:29, Ephesians 5, and James 1:26, there is no rational grounds to reject ANY curseword given the “neutral” context. I hope you realize that when you reject bad words, then all words are now good? This means that he commits himself to the notion that words are inherently immoral. That certain words are immoral in any given circumstances to use. I think an example would show the … Continue reading Bridled Tongues