We’re going to take a look at an article from Creation Ministries International by Dr. Jonathan Sarfati titled, “Is using the Bible to prove the Bible circular reasoning?” Here’s a key excerpt: All philosophical systems start with axioms (presuppositions), or … Continue reading Revelation, Not Assumption: A Critique of the Axiomatic Defense
There is a growing animosity in our culture growing against capital punishment (CP). This is also tied in with different theological branches that also have input on this debate and ethical concerns. In this article, I will be taking certain … Continue reading Whoever Sheds Man’s Blood: God’s Justice Revealed
In recent years, a model of biblical inerrancy has gained traction in seminaries and among scholars that stands in contrast to the Chicago Statement on Inerrancy. One of the chief proponents of this model is John Walton, a well-known Old … Continue reading A Critique of John Walton’s Model of Inerrancy: Upholding the Chicago Statement
By Jimmy Stephens and TheSire 1. Sincerity of the Offer (Deceptive Offer Argument) Objection: If God sovereignly intends that some people never come to Christ, how can His gospel offer to them be sincere? Isn’t it deceptive to command someone … Continue reading The Sincerity of the Gospel Call: Resolving the Apparent Dilemma in Limited Atonement
From Chris Matthew: There are a couple of remarks that merit response, @FondestAlloy. 1. Do you deny the possibility of knowing whether something is objectively true?2. You describe pessimistic meta-induction well. In the future, there is the possibility (a high … Continue reading Epistemic Chaos: The Disarray of Unbelief
Chris Matthew Responds to an Argument Making the Rounds on Twitter. The Wretched argument. “Wretched” is an apt term, if not an understatement, for something as difficult as this. Before I begin my rejoinder, though, I’ll reproduce the argument here: … Continue reading Divine Essence and Creation: Chris Matthew’s Analysis of Creatorhood and Aseity
🔊 Listen to this Chris Matthew responded to the critique presented by Jon the Orthodox. So, I’ll post the previous articles in regards to this discussion: http://spirited-tech.com/COG/2020/01/21/is-sola-scriptura-self-refuting/ Here is now his addition to the conversation: Greetings. Are you Roman Catholic, Eastern … Continue reading Scripture Alone: Defending the Biblical, Logical, and Historical Case for Sola Scriptura
This is from Chris Matthew: An argument on the transgender phenomenon 1. If it is rational for some people to be transgender, then it is rational for some people to be transspecies (or ‘otherkin’). 2. It is not rational for … Continue reading Transgenderism and the Animal Kingdom
In Defence of the Finest of Presuppositionalists: A Response to Omni by Chris Matthew Hello there. I’m writing in response to Omni’s video about classical logic and presuppositionalism. I’m a modest (Framean) presuppositionalist. Now, I am not committed to classical … Continue reading In Defence of the Finest of Presuppositionalists: A Response to Omni
“The Folly of Unbelief: Philosophical Illustrations of the Futility of Unbelieving Thought” is the best introductory text for Van Tilians since William Dennison’s work “In Defense of the Eschaton: Essays in Reformed Apologetics” and Dr. Christopger Watkin’s “Thinking through Creation: … Continue reading The Folly of Unbelief
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.