Analogical Warfare: Van Til vs Aquinas
Click here to watch on YouTube: Click here for more on Thomism Continue reading Analogical Warfare: Van Til vs Aquinas
Click here to watch on YouTube: Click here for more on Thomism Continue reading Analogical Warfare: Van Til vs Aquinas
Daniel Akande has written a book called “The Folly of Unbelief: Philosophical Illustrations of the Futility of Unbelieving Thought”. Daniel is a prolific blogger and a highly informed Van Tilian thinker. This will surely be an upcoming classic text for … Continue reading Book Promotion: The Folly of Unbelief
This is another response to David Pallmann: To briefly review our controversy, in my video against presuppositional apologetics I argued that Aristotle’s transcendental argument (TA) for the law of noncontradiction was fatally flawed for three distinct reasons two of which … Continue reading What has Aristotle to do with Van Til?
Some maintain that presuppositionalism is really no different from post-modernism because it asserts that there is no objective source to lay aside our presuppositions and actually know the world apart from any worldviews. That we are merely stuck in our … Continue reading Is Presuppositionalism Postmodernism?
This is a conversation in the group of people I hang out with: Atheist: Jimmy explain how God can be both universal and particular. Also explain how His being these two things somehow grounds their presence in the world. Jimmy … Continue reading Van Til’s Sycophant
There has been a discussion for how Reformed Christians should understand the usefulness and the errors in the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas. I think like every thinker that he is a mixed bag and you will have to weight aspects … Continue reading A Reformed Look at Aquinas
I discussed in a previous article some of the basic principles of presuppositionalism. I think I might be able to expand on some of those principles. 1. Transcendental Argument: In the last article, I briefly discussed the form of the transcendental argument and the disagreement that exist on how to formulate the Transcendental argument for God’s existence. The issue is that the transcendental argument for God’s existence isn’t merely one formulation, but rather a family of similarly formed arguments. I think it is perfectly acceptable to argue either form of the Transcendental argument. There was one objection that arose that neither of these arguments demonstrates that God … Continue reading Presup before Dessert
This is an article that is an introduction to what I believe the method of Reformed Apologetics that we should use and that should be understood as the best approach. 1. Transcendental Argument: This is just an introduction to the presuppositionalist argument known as TAG. TAG stands for the transcendental argument for God’s existence. What is a transcendental argument(TA)? They are arguments that deal with preconditions of knowledge and I think it could be expanded to one that deals with the preconditions for ethics. These are truths that are necessary for other truths to make sense. It means that a certain belief is … Continue reading A little Presup before Dinner
You must be logged in to post a comment.