A Tale of Two Justifications by Jimmy Stephens Foundationalism struggles to comport with infallibility. Coherentism struggles to comport with fallibility. They are both faulty views in a justification dialectic. Coherentism proposes some criteria of cohesion. Beliefs have to cohere or … Continue reading A Tale of Two Justifications
I think platonism suffers from further issues than the video states. Take the issue from different angles: The problem of Induction, Causality, and reliability of our minds: It is hard to see that there is much a reason to suppose … Continue reading Plato: A Van Tilian’s Thoughts
I have had many conversations with Open Theists. The recent statement from Cameron Bertuzzi that he can’t decide between Open Theism and Molinism (which are both two bad positions) makes me think it is worth putting some of what I’ve … Continue reading My Responses to Various Open Theists
The Problem of the Criterion: A Christian’s Thoughts by Jimmy Stephens The problem with particularism is spelled out by philosophers who try to handle the problem of the criterion. Namely, it is subjectivism. When the epistemologist calls one of his … Continue reading The Problem of the Criterion: A Christian’s Thoughts
I wish to make a few comments on the review by Jonathan Mclatchie of “Canon Revisited – Establishing the Origins and Authority of the New Testament Books, by Michael J. Kruger”. I’ve discussed his perspective briefly somewhere else and I … Continue reading Canon, Internalism, and Sola Scriptura
(I had Jimmy Stephens rewrite this and I think his additions made it better.) Oftentimes, Christians face questions about skeptical scenarios. These scenarios come in different degrees or strengths or tiers of skepticism. For example, there is skepticism about the … Continue reading God’s Novel and Computer Simulations
Here is the link to go to youtube. Continue reading A Conversation on Epistemology with an LDS
There recently was a debate regarding apologetic methodology. It was between Dr. James White, Dr. Jonathan McLatchie, Dr. Randal Rauser & Dr. Richard Howe. I wish to comment on each one’s perspective and come to some conclusion regarding the performance … Continue reading 4 Views on Apologetics: White, Rauser, McLatchie, and Howe
[responsivevoice_button] We are going to take a look at an article from Creation Ministries International by Dr. Jonathan Sarfati about whether using the Bible to prove the Bible is circular: All philosophical systems start with axioms (presuppositions), or non-provable propositions accepted as true, … Continue reading The Unbreakable Circle
The Council 
You must be logged in to post a comment.